Home / Staff Blogs / Pesky Reruns
Posted on Feb 26, 2013
Staff Blogs

Pesky Reruns

Re-runs have really become a biggie in the world of recreational team roping recently.  While everyone is in agreement that they are necessary, the interpretation of the PRCA term "ability to compete" has been debatable and fairly subjective. The entire issue is causing a perpetual headache for contractors and flaggers as they try to establish balance in handling them and at the same time try to figure out what to do with the chronic customers requesting reruns at every turn. These chronics seem to fall into two groups, the people who reason they have nothing to lose by asking for reruns at every roping, and the people who believe that anytime they miss it is the fault of the steer.

 

The rerun issue has reached a point where finding and keeping good flaggers is getting harder, particularily at large ropings. The flaggers argue that they are in a no-win situation as not granting and sometime granting, seems to create a conflict, and their explanation rarely ends the conversation. As a result, flaggers seem to avoid those conflicts by two different methods; those who rarely give anyone a rerun, and those who seem to give everyone a rerun.  Obviously, that statement might be a little simplistic and extreme, but if they plan on flagging for an extended amount of time, they generally develope a personal policy for conflict management that doesn't involve the philosophy of the contractor or association.

 

With millions at stake we went way overboard at this last Finale addressing fairness with the cattle. If you were there, then you couldn't help but notice how much extra attention we gave to be certain the bulk of the rotations were clean. We had a rerun judge sitting at the back of the arena, and arena judge, and replay judge to make sure there was nothing a flagger might have missed, had the break-out barrier to settle the speed arguments, had a support official in the arena to intercept ropers before they reached the flagger and act as laison between the roper, flagger and me to make sure every contested run was reviewed. And finally, we had the instant replay video. But clearly this level of review will only occur once per year.


 But even with these efforts it doesn't answer the overall issue of how our qualification contractors deal with this growing problem with their flaggers. As noted in the rule book I have asked all the contractors to step up and handle the situation. After the flagger makes his call, step in and take any conflict away from the flagger and away from the middle of the arena. Obviously we have some of them that aren't crazy about that idea, and they are generally instructing the flaggers to be super conservative. But that doesn't go over real well and creates more conflict for the flagger.  If we aren't careful the idea that you should get a fair shake can backfire and the flagging actually start being worse instead of better.  We have noticed that  about half of these rerun requests are being generated by the same individuals. We are doing our best to make sure that the flaggers at the qualification ropings know who the chronics are, and make sure they these folks don't get the benefit of the doubt.  That addresses half the problem, but to be honest we don't have a clue how to do anything different or better than what we are already doing.       
Log in to use your Facebook account with
WStroping

Login With Facebook Account



Recent Activity on WStroping

Countdown to Finale IX

Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds